On Mi, 12.12.07 16:11 "Rui Nuno Capela" <rncbc@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> On Wed, December 12, 2007 15:51, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 15:10, gimpel wrote:
> >
> >> Could you please rename the tarball on sourceforge to .gz or
> >> upload a real .bz2?
> >>
> >
> > Several people have asked me this. Apologies for the mistake; I've
> > uploaded a real .bz2 now, to replace the bz2 with a gz extension I
> > originally uploaded.
> >
> > While I'm grateful to have the error caught, I'm intrigued as to
> > why so many people thought this was important enough to write an
> > email about -- why would anyone really care? Surely anyone
> > prepared to build this from source is capable of unpacking an
> > archive that happens to have the wrong extension? Am I missing
> > something?
> >
>
> have you considered automated packaging into your equation? gentoo
> comes to mind, but i'm not a gentooer :)
>
> cheers
That's exactly why I asked for a new tarball.. I want to update the
Gentoo ebuild in our pro-audio overlay, and portage doesn't simply use
tar xvf, but bunzip2 && tar x
For sure affects other source based meta-distros too.
Thanks for the new tarball!
Regards,
Tom
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 13 2007 - 00:15:03 EET