2008/1/25, Florent Berthaut <hitmuri@email-addr-hidden-log.org>:
>
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano a écrit :
>
>
> Ok finally, i tried to disable the second core ( i have a dual core
> 2GHz) and things get really better this way, i can lauch more
> applications with 4,8ms latency and no xruns. I had already disabled
> cpuspeed but it looks like it was not enough.
>
> That points to a realtime kernel problem with (probably) timekeeping in
> two core processors (ie: "time of day" is not perfectly synchronized
> between the processors so that if jack migrates from one to another it
> appears as there has been too much delay and things don't work as
> intended). I have seen this happen in 2.6.23.x + rt14.
>
> What happens if you boot dual core with the "idle=poll" kernel
> parameter? (I assume this happens with 2.6.22.x).
>
> -- Fernando
>
>
> Looks like it solves the problem, even the 2.6.23.x (latest ccrma kernel)
> works well with this parameter.
> Thanks.
>
> Florent
>
Hi, I would like to know how did you disable your 2nd core ? Does it affect
the general performances ?
Thanks
Mysth-R
>
>
-- * *************************************************************************************** * {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^} * * http://myspace.com/mysthr * http://myspace.com/aideauditive * http://mysthr.free.fr => Site dédié à l'audio sous Fedora/PlanetCCRMA. * ***************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Jan 25 12:15:07 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 25 2008 - 12:15:07 EET