On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 14:07 +0900, '2+ wrote:
> hmm
> i wonder which direction SC-dev-ppl are aimed to..
> if that jack module for pulse becomes good enough
> we can mix SC,mpg321,yatm all together .. hoooray!
> but SC directly to pulse might make things much simpler
> at
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Pulseaudio
> i found CS doing things on pulse and it seems to be RT oriented
Pulse is *great*. but .... its not JACK. if low latency matters, then
Pulse is (currently) not the answer. or not the best answer.
--p
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Jan 31 20:15:12 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 20:15:12 EET