Re: [LAU] OT: 32-bit vs 64-bit speeds

From: Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Feb 04 2008 - 17:28:58 EET

Am Montag, 4. Februar 2008 schrieb Dave Phillips:
> Obviously the memory handling capacity is much greater on the 64-bit
> machine, and I expect that we'll all be running 64-bit boxes eventually.

No, 32bit and 1GB of ram ought to be enough for everybody!

/me ducks out through the backdoor

Arnold

-- 
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your 
administrator to do so...

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part.

Received on Mon Feb 4 20:15:02 2008

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Francisco López: "[LAU] a SndObj Library tutorial?"
Previous message: M-.-n: "Re: [LAU] simple DJ program"
Maybe in reply to: david: "[LAU] OT: 32-bit vs 64-bit speeds"
Next in thread: david: "Re: [LAU] OT: 32-bit vs 64-bit speeds"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 04 2008 - 20:15:03 EET