Dear Linux audio-user,
I'm not a developer but a user who wants to know why certain things in
open source are what they are.
I want to know why LASH is unsupported by so many programms. Mostly sad
for the "big" programms like Ardour, Rosegarden, Linuxsampler and all
these...
JACK is a superior concept and nearly all programms happily integrated a
Jack client.
In my opinion LASH is a same fundamental concept to connect the "one
function - one programm" philosophy to an audio workspace, like JACK
already does.
So why is there so low interest in LASH?
Nils
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Apr 3 12:15:02 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 03 2008 - 12:15:02 EEST