Re: [LAU] reiser4.... has it a place for audio?

Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:43 PM, naysayer <gateswideopen@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> hi crew...
>>
>> i have just been looking at the benchmarking stats for reiser4 and it looks
>> pretty cool. i was wondering if there is there is any reason to implement
>> this kind of file system in multimedia environments. i current have my
>> root/system partition as reiserFS and my home partition as ext3. i find this
>> to be quite efficient but perhaps if there would be an improvement to
>> recording stability and speed, then perhaps it could work well with apps
>> like ardour. although, reiser seems to be happiest with small files, reiser4
>> claims to be more efficient than ext3.... or that could be just spin.
>
> These days the choice of filesystem should make no significant
> difference.

I switched from ReiserFS to EXT3 quite awhile ago, and can't say that
one is any faster than the other. A friend of mine switched from EXT2 to
EXT3 on his server and reported a very large speed improvement, but he
doesn't do audio work.

-- 
David
gnome@email-addr-hidden
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user