On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 schrieb Ken Restivo:
>> Good call on Ardour; I probably would have had the easiest time working
>> with this file in Ardour. Ardour is sweet. But for just editing one long
>> audio file, it seemed a bit like overkill. Also, I'd be too tempted to
>> overdub onto it, which is a no-no for a live recording :-)
>
> There are actually very good reasons to use ardour for post-processing of
> live-recordings:
> - Its completely non-destructive, even if you slice your 2-hour-file into
> 10-seconds snippets and rearrange them and delete them one-by-one, you still
> don't loose the material. Yes, you should have backups, but who knows...
> - Its _very_ easy to apply mastering effects over the whole session. (And
> with the jamin-control-plugin you can change settings between songs.)
> - And all editing on effects and automation is non-destructive too. That is
> very nice compared to clicking "apply effect (silence)", having the computer
> work for ten minutes and the realize that a) its the wrong effect and b)
> the "create undo" wasn't selected.
> - ardour is definitely not trying to load the whole 2-hour file into ram...
Don't forget the CD markers -> TOC export for creating CDs easily with
Ardour. Works great for live CDs where you want to add track
boundaries with no gaps for disk-at-once burning.
jlc
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Jun 13 00:15:02 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 13 2008 - 00:15:02 EEST