lør, 12 07 2008 kl. 15:26 +0200, skrev Kjetil S. Matheussen:
> I wonder if you may be confusing realtime priority with normal priority?
> "nice" (which controls normal priority programs) doesn't prevent other
> apps from running once in a while.
I know that nice is used to control processor time, my complain about
your example was that you got one process set up at nice -19 and another
at nice -20, how realistic is that in the discuss ?. But if we could
agree that more processortime means more flow in execution I don't think
we are that dissident at all !
/Sv-e
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Jul 13 00:15:27 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 00:15:27 EEST