Re: [LAU] like rme multiface?

From: sh0099 <sh0099@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Aug 01 2008 - 21:49:45 EEST

Arnold Krille schrieb:
> Am Freitag, 1. August 2008 schrieb Florian Faber:
>
>>> oh, i need the low latency :-(
>>>
>> What for?
>> Hypothesis:
>> People saying that they need low latency without stating what for usually
>> don't need low latency.
>>
i do live electronic musik
so i use the input and process it and use the output maybe again as
input ...

> At least not in the time-range they say. Or they are coming from the other os
> where low latency means something between 20ms 200ms (opposed to 2ms to 10ms
> in the linux world).
> @sh0099: If you are coming from win and asio reports a low latency of <10ms,
> be aware that this is not round-trip latency that asio reports. Add
> transport-buffers and adc/dac buffers and maybe even some os-specific delays
> to that. And only trust the real round-trip measurements.
>
i don't know
i did not make a latency measurement myself. but i know that a latency
above 50ms would be ugly.
i used a fireface on a mac and i liked it ... but ...

rme writes that the fireface has (sometimes?) 1.5ms (64samples) higher
latency than the hdsp pci ...
http://www.rme-audio.de/en_support_techinfo.php?page=content/support/en_support_techinfo_fahlen_measuring_true_performance

...

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Aug 2 00:15:02 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 02 2008 - 00:15:02 EEST