Re: [LAU] A Linux Audio distro that can keep up?

From: Hermann Meyer <brummer-@web.de>
Date: Sat Aug 30 2008 - 09:03:37 EEST

Am Samstag, 30. August 2008 00:18:19 schrieb Darren Landrum:

>
> I'm beginning to suspect that it's impossible to keep an audio distro up
> to date, and that I'll have to do it manually. Arch64 has a great
> system, but their precompiled binaries are very vanilla, and the user
> "experience" felt very patched together. It was a chore to do very basic
> things, like access my DVD-R (it could only do so in root).
>
> I love how polished Ubuntu is, but keeping some software packages up to
> date is a chore. I don't think I'm getting around it, though. I just
> wish I could figure out why I can't compile vamp-sdk, or why it is I
> need that to compile Rubber Band to begin with.
>
> I think what I'm going to do is make a list of software to remove from
> my system, and then simply keep up on that software manually, and hope I
> can keep it all working.
>
> -- Darren

I am realy happy with sidux. It's allway's up to date (rolling release) and I
never have a prob with compile the app I wont. Also the rt-kernel is allways
up to date.

regards hermann
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Aug 30 12:15:04 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 30 2008 - 12:15:04 EEST