Re: [LAU] [LAD] Ubuntu Studio 8.10, -rt and 2.6.27

>> while sharing this experience, i am curious, whether there are any
>> insights, why this is the case?
>> did anyone come up with an analysis of the problem source? maybe
>> bisecting the kernel source?
>
> I haven't been following the RT list that closely over the last couple
> of weeks, but I think you'll find that version is WAY ahead of the
> stable RT patches.
>
> I got my RT working about 4 weeks ago and was advised by the RT
> developers to go for the latest stable - 2.6.24.7-rt17

i am lurking on the linux-rt-users list for a while and i haven't read
any references, why 2.6.26 (patched or unpatched) is not suitable for low-
latency audio ...

still 2.6.26-rt3 is unusable for me and, as paul mentioned, also for
others ... i'd be curious about the reasons, though ...

t

-- 
tim@email-addr-hidden
http://tim.klingt.org
Your mind will answer most questions if you learn to relax and wait
for the answer.
  William S. Burroughs
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user