Re: [LAU] licensing fun, was Re: Yamaha Disklavier Pro grand piano

From: Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Sep 18 2008 - 18:05:53 EEST

Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2008 schrieb James Stone:
> What I don't quite understand is that Qt has a free/commercial
> separate licensing, but no-one has the same kind of problem with qt
> that they have with LS? Would someone care to explain?

No one??? You surely are funny! What do you think why gnome was founded???

Not because Qt wasn't free, but because Qt wasn't free enough. Kind of like
the same as with LS/Eisenkraut/etc. not being free enough.

BTW: If libgig is truly free, why don't we use it to integrate gig-support
into fluidsynth?

Have fun,

Arnold

-- 
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your 
administrator to do so...

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Received on Thu Sep 18 20:15:06 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 18 2008 - 20:15:06 EEST