Re: [LAU] licensing fun, was Re: Yamaha Disklavier Pro grand piano

Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2008 schrieb Randy Kramer:
> You are right in that Qt wasn't free enough (in the opinion of, for
> example, Richard Stallman, and I agreed (FWIW ;-)), but dual licensing
> was not the issue at that time.
> > I can't recall the issue exactly, but, in fact, dual licensing was a
> solution to the issue--Qt was not free at the time, by adopting the GPL
> (and dual licensing to protect their commercial interests)

No, it was always dual-licensed: commercial and QPL. And the QPL was later
changed to GPL. Which itself afaik was only possible because all payed devs
intellectual property was in trolltechs hands...

Have fun,

Arnold

-- 
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your 
administrator to do so...

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user