On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 16:17 +0000, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> I'm tempted to have a go at a similar app myself. Maybe you could give
> me some advice on what went right with galan and what to avoid.
If you value your time, you should better consider to write a
gui-builder for Ingen. Among the plus-points of Ingen are
- nested patches with sub-patches that are handled very similar to
plugin nodes
- Polyphony handling making it easy to build polyphonic synth patches.
- gui/engine separation. The engine is also meant to be embeddable
There might be a way to realise a gui-builder that is both useful for
Ingen patches and LV2 plugins.
Or you could pick up development of Galan instead of reinventing the
wheel.
-- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue Nov 11 20:15:07 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 11 2008 - 20:15:07 EET