Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues

David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 23 November 2008 15:08:51 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't get the licence issue of VST on linux completely, help me out
>> with this.
>>
>>
>> - Building Ardour, Qtractor, LMMS with VST-support is illegal, right?
> Building is OK for your own use. You cannot distribute the versions to anyone
> else. The ardour build config program tells you this explicitly. I believ the
> qtractor and LMMS use the dssi-vst versions of the headers so do not need a
> copy of the VST SDK to build. See beloe.

No. Qtractor needs a copy of the original VST-SDK headers to build
alright. The LMMS so-called vestige ones doesn't have all the needed
source features. And I still have my doubts (see my other reply in this
thread)

>> - And energyxt? Are they allowed to use VST technology?
> I believe they pay for the privilege and you pay for their program.
>> - Installing JOST and using it, is illegal right?
> For your own use, I believe no problem.
>> - And FST and vst-dssi?
> For your own use. Recent vst-dssi have their own version of the header files
> which is hopefully legal and do not need Steinberg's. I am not sure of the
> real legal situation with this.

yeah. hopefully :)

cheers

-- 
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc@email-addr-hidden
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user