Re: [LAU] RT patch not needed for new kernels (?)

From: porl sheean <porl42@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Nov 27 2008 - 07:56:13 EET

i haven't had any real problems with 2.6.26 RT patches, but i don't
use my midi gear in linux (waiting for ardour 3 branch to mature a bit
more first). is there any reason the 2.6.26 patch hasn't been ported
forward to 2.6.27? are the changes that prominent that the patch is
too difficult to port? i remember the last few releases (24, 25 and
26) didn't take too long before a (albeit preliminary) patch was
available, but i have found nothing at all for 27. i'd like to update
this machine to intrepid but i want to make sure i'm not going
backwards in terms of rt support (i know i can use the older kernel
i'm using now, but it kinda defeats the purpose of upgrading then). i
noticed there is a 2.6.27-rt package in intrepid actually, what is
this if the rt patches aren't available yet?

sorry to ramble

porl

2008/11/27 <torbenh@email-addr-hidden>:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 03:45:45PM -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> In both cases you will need a working Jack and you will need to run it
>> with realtime priority (which has nothing to do with the realtime
>> preemption patches).
>
> the rumor i am concerned about, is, that you need an RT kernel to run
> jackd.
>
> can people stop saying this please ?
>
> --
> torben Hohn
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

-- 
i am kurious oranj!
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Nov 27 08:15:02 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 27 2008 - 08:15:03 EET