Re: [LAU] Ubuntu Hard real time kernel (2.6.24-21) poor performance.

From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Dec 04 2008 - 06:31:01 EET

On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 16:44 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > So far the most "stable" realtime kernel for me has been is
> > 2.6.24.7-rt21 (if we are talking about recent kernels, of course).
>
> Well, it's "good to know" that RT and its typical usage domains such as
> music and audio processing are still a pretty low priority for the
> kernel developers, even after all these years. :-(

I don't know if there's development I don't know about. I suspect that a
lot of the development was with the goal of realtime transaction
oriented applications, not audio... we got our wishes as a side
effect :-) If that is so (and I may be completely wrong) we may get our
wishes again when the companies marketing these products have to upgrade
their kernels (it is a slower cycle)...

-- Fernando

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Dec 4 08:15:01 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 04 2008 - 08:15:01 EET