Re: [LAU] : Netjack : like a charm :)

Hi,

>> * So the problem was seq24 on the slave machine was running at this own
>> tempo. If the master use 120BPM and the Slave 110, they are not
>> synchronized. But if you put 120 on both, it seems to be synchronized...
>> Well I think there is a bug in seq24 or something. I didn't try with other
>> softwares. But I have some doubt about the real tempo synchronization.
>
> as stated, it only synchronizes the framecount.
> netjack2 seems to do complete tempo synchronisation, but i dont know
> if its latency compensated. and i also had somebody reporting,
> that it just fails with an assert triggered.
>

are you running on 64bit?
Still no tempo sync, but the new release of seq24 fixes this:

[...]
Fixed Bugs
* Fixed BPM saving on 64 bit platforms."
[...]

Have a look at this post:
http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--seq24-0.9.0-%28Rejoicing-Rika%29-is-out-td20740927.html
)

best,
d
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Dec 10 20:15:02 2008