Re: [LAU] disappointing experience with firewire

From: Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Dec 31 2008 - 18:46:54 EET

On Wednesday 31 December 2008 17:29:23 Florian Faber wrote:
> > Now my question to those who also tried firewire audio: was it a success
> > story for you from the beginning or did anybody make similar experiences
> > and how did you proceed further?
> Wenn Du kuerzestmoegliche Latenz brauchst und mit dem Notebook arbeiten
> MUSST, dann wirst Du nicht um etwas wie eine RME Multiface/Digiface
> herumkommen - mit PCMCIA-Adapter. Firewire ist leider nicht wirklich
> brauchbar in der Hinsicht.

First: This is still an english-speaking list...

Second: That might be your oppinion, but its not a universal rule. I did use
my firewire-setup with great success for live-foh-mixing and foh-effects. Yes, I
did have low-latency. Firewire is capable of that...
And I don't think buying an expensive RME pcmcia interface will help Susanne
because her pcmcia-slot is sharing its interrupt with the graphics card.
Regardless whether there is a modem, a fw-controller or a rme-interface in
there, its always sharing its interrupt with the (nvidia-)graphics card...

Have fun,

Arnold

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Received on Wed Dec 31 20:15:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 31 2008 - 20:15:04 EET