Jorn, any information would be appreciated, thank you.
Alex.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier <
nettings@email-addr-hidden-hochschule.de> wrote:
> alex stone wrote:
> > Fons, just a follow up to the discussion about an orchestral placement
> > template, is there a definitive resource somewhere i can go to, and
> > learn more about ambisonics, and how this might help me to achieve the
> > Holy Grail of true placement recording? I've read back through your
> > comments about routing to A and B to achieve 'local' and overall
> > placement, re convolution, but i will admit i don;t understand all of it.
> >
> > I'm convinced that this is a big step forward for recording in a more
> > realistic....'space'. But my lack of knowledge is holding me back from
> > being able to present the concept in a more intelligent way.
>
> i'm preparing a paper for lac2009 about correct placement of spot mikes
> in an ambisonic 3d mix, which might be interesting to you. but it does
> not involve "correct" convolution reverb, which is somewhat more tricky.
> if you want, i'll send you a preprint as soon as i've banged it into
> shape - it's due by jan 29th...
>
> by fons' definition, i have an "intuitive" grasp of ambisonics. it took
> no black magic to attain and it is sufficient in practice to get a job
> done, unless you want to push limits or need to debug a system, in which
> case it's good to have some math wizards to ask :)
> consider joining the sursound mailing list, if you want to dig deeper in
> to ambisonics, but make sure you have an efficient mail filter :)
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Jan 21 00:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 21 2009 - 00:15:02 EET