Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?)

From: Cassiel <raffaele.morelli@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jan 27 2009 - 16:49:29 EET

I can document... if you will ever been in italy.

> 5.3ms latencies: If you can't sense it... you don't need it
that's what you can read in the online help for many kernel modules, have
you ever heard about "sense of umor"?

However, apologize if this seems supercilious to you.

Back to the point, I have never said 5.3ms latency is useless.
But while I can record my guitar or bass or drums without any problem
because I do not need monitoring, adding a vocal track doing monitoring
using software monitoring + headphones (using a bus in ardour with Gverb or
other fx) it's not so nice because of latency.

My computerbased setup is 2.9ms latency with a Terratec EWS88MT, may I sent
you a video to document this?

regards
r

2009/1/27 Svend-Erik Kjær Madsen <sv-e@email-addr-hidden-e.dk>

> On tir, 2009-01-27 at 15:03 +0100, Cassiel wrote:
>
> >
> > 5.3ms latencies: If you can't sense it... you don't need it
> >
> > r
>
> >
> Being supercilious dosn't document any facts !
>
> What I read here is that 5.3ms is useless, then most computerbased
> setups will fail your demands then.
>
> /Sv-e
>
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Jan 27 20:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 27 2009 - 20:15:02 EET