Re: [LAU] Anyone got OpenMusic 5.2.1 to work? Or at least MidiShare?

Hello Yann,

that worked as expected :-) Thanks.

Just one problem: the archlinux init system is different from the redhat
one - so it doesn't work out-of-box as of now.
I'll send a patch when I have time to see into this.

Cheers,

Holger

Yann Orlarey wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In order to compile MidiShare you must use the 'dev' branch of the CVS
> (the main branch doesn't compile and have to be updated). To download
> the 'dev' branch you can use the following CVS command (on a single line) :
>
> cvs -z3
> -d:pserver:anonymous@email-addr-hidden:/cvsroot/midishare co
> -P -r dev midishare
>
> Make sure you have the headers of your kernel installed. Then :
>
> cd src/linux
> ./configure
> make
> sudo make install
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Yann
>
>
> Karim.Haddad@email-addr-hidden wrote:
>> Dear Dave,
>> Dear Holger,
>>
>> Yes unfortunately, Om 5.x was somehow freezed. Some of us are trying the
>> best to follow Om's developpement in parrallel. These are the ad news.
>> Now for the rather good news,
>>
>> Om 6.x is born under LispWorks. But, we have some young geeks interested
>> to port the new om on SBCL. For the time being it is in the embrionic
>> stage. THe kernel did build. No wonder , it is no different from the 5.x
>> version. However, the big challenge is the api, since it did change for
>> the better. Now the official developpement is heading always
>> (unfortunately) on Lispworks, for Mac, and now , (oooups) for windows
>> plateform. The good thing is that if it does succeed (and it is on the way
>> to ) it will most probably tun on linux under Lispworks. But since,
>> lispwoks is not gpl, we linux guys are interested in the sbcl version that
>> is far more (as a compiler) faster, and better.
>>
>> Well these are the news. Will most probably get you to know in a month or
>> two of further hopefully advancement . And if the gods are with us, (and
>> the penguins;-)) we hope to have a version running in 2009.
>> BEst to u all.
>> Karim
>>
>>
>>> Holger Ballweg wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm currently trying to get OpenMusic working on ArchLinux, without the
>>>> tiniest success. I´d really like to know if anyone has this running
>>>> currently...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Alas, OM's Linux development is pretty slow, if not actually dead at
>>> this time. Karim Haddad is the man to contact, I've cc'd this message to
>>> him.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Did anyone get MidiShare to build and work on a 2.6.1x kernel?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes, IIRC there are some packages prepared by Dr Albert Graef that will
>>> build against some 2.6 kernels. Also cc'd.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Did anyone get so far to use OpenMusic on linux in recent times?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No, but the last time it worked for me I noted that Karim had done some
>>> good work on usability. Alas, IRCAM is rather devoted to commercial
>>> software. I understand that OM development is now primarily on the Mac
>>> and uses a proprietary toolkit (LispWorks, I think).
>>>
>>>
>>>> MidiShare btw bails out with this:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I suggest that you try to reach Dr Graf, Karim Haddad, and maybe Yann
>>> Orlarey at GRAME (also cc'd).
>>>
>>> Good luck, and do let us know how you get along with this project.
>>>
>>> Btw, AlgoScore is definitely worth your attention, but it isn't much
>>> like Open Music. Also, I wrote to the author of pwgl and inquired about
>>> a Linux port. He never replied.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> dp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Feb 2 20:15:01 2009