Re: [LAU] Bpm detection/quantize

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 12 2009 - 17:10:51 EET

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Frank Barknecht <fbar@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Hallo,
> Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
>> Anyway it's not just "automatic accompaniment" as in "Band in a Box"
>> that I'm referring to, but the use of a computer to do what it can do
>> better than any human, namely carrying out algorithms for complicated
>> processes designed by a human.
>
> Oh, and btw: It's interesting that in this thread there are complains
> when a computer is used to add a beat to music while in another thread
> the addition of reverb to music seems to be no problem at all. I know a
> lot of natural rooms that give a much more beautiful reverberation than
> any digital allpass network can generate. ;)
>
> Ciao
> --
> Frank

If we give computers the 'intelligence' to add beats then possibly we
should give, or have already given, computers the intelligence to
decide which is better? Maybe they don't like our music and are simply
trying to express themselves to their own target audience... ;-)

- Mark
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 12 20:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 12 2009 - 20:15:02 EET