Re: [LAU] 64studio, FFADO, no luck

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 21:41, Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Tuesday 17 February 2009 21:06:29 Anders Dahnielson wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 20:39, Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden>
> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 20:30:53 Ken Restivo wrote:
> > > > OK well that throws a monkey wrench into my plan to convert the
> studio
> > > from
> > > > Mac/ProTools to Linux/Ardour. Damn.
> > > Maybe you can start by convincing them about Mac/Ardour?
> > > I don't really understand why mac-users (especially if they paid
> premium
> > > money
> > > for hardware) should switch to Linux where half their hardware isn't
> > > supported... Shouldn't ardour (through jackd/portaudio) play perfectly
> > > one the
> > > digi-stuff?
> > Yes. but I think you answered the question yourself in the last sentence.
>
> I did? I didn't say "Make them buy overpriced proprietary stuff to use it
> with
> free software", I said "If they already happen to have the bad proprietary
> stuff, why try to convince them off the full free ensemble where they have
> to
> spend more money on new hardware if they could just do a smooth transition
> by
> switching one component at a time?" Applies both for Mac/ProTool and
> Mac/Motu...
>
> Or is the digi-stuff not usable with apples' portaudio?
>

Oh, I think I missread. Sorry.

-- 
Anders Dahnielson
<anders@email-addr-hidden>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 18 00:15:05 2009