Arnold Krille wrote:
> I don't understand your question?
Ok.
> chuck and ams are independant applications, there is no reason why they
> shouldn't run in parallel on different cores.
We agree on that.
> Both use threads to split their work, again there is no reason they have all
> their threads running on the same core. In fact one of the reasons to use
> threads is to make use of multiple cores within one app.
But doubling the load (for instance by adding more voices to ams) makes
*both* threads rise by (about) 100%. Wouldn't you expect for instance
gui threads to stay the same. Other cpu heavy processes seem to use only
one core, for instance building stuff from source. Also...
> With standard jack it *should* be that all jack-related threads run on one
> core, in your case leaving the second core for gui- and disk-threads. jackdmp
> makes use of multiple cores as far as I know.
...chuck is non gui and the code I'm running in chuck (my own) doesn't
use disk i/o. Starting ams with -n (nogui) it still takes up two
threads. It looks like this in htop:
http://atte.dk/download/ams_nogui.png
So one thread with prio 20 and one with -76 chewing away at the same 27%.
It might be totally normal and totally unavoidable, but I'm just curious
and doubtful :-)
-- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sat May 2 00:15:01 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 02 2009 - 00:15:02 EEST