Dan S wrote:
> Maybe your softwares support load-sharing over multiple processors (a
> good thing, no?) and therefore all the work is being neatly divided
> between the processors. Any reason that should be bad?
No, what would be great. Unfortunately I'm pretty that's not what's
happening. With the same patch I can run 35 (but not 40) voices in ams
on dual core and 45 (but not 50) with one core disabled:
http://atte.dk/download/ams_dual_poly35.png
http://atte.dk/download/ams_single_poly35.png
http://atte.dk/download/ams_single_poly40.png
So performance is (or seems to me, not knowing much about the inner
working of neither a dualcore cpu or linux multicore implementation to
be) slightly better with one core.
-- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sat May 2 04:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 02 2009 - 04:15:02 EEST