Re: [LAU] Fons could you make us an Hammond ;)

Scott wrote:
> Garry Ogle wrote:
>
>> Julien Claassen wrote:
>>
>>> You're right. But a couple of us have tried and it didn't work. We might do a
>>> kind of a petition and send him a kind plea with the petitioners names attached.
>>> Might that help? I've heard it, it sounds great. Kindest regards Julien
>>>
>>>
>> Hi, Julien. Did you succeed in contacting this guy and he refused? Or couldn't you
>> make contact? When was that?
>>
>> I love the sounds on his samples! You can have my name on that petition!
>>
>
> His license includes a reason it's not open source:
>
>
>> 1. LICENSE - PLEASE READ
>>
>> YOU MAY FREELY DOWNLOAD AND INSTALL A COPY OF THE SOFTWARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE.
>> YOU MAY NOT BUNDLE, RENAME, SELL, REDISTRIBUTE, REPACKAGE OR IN ANY OTHER WAY ALTER
>> WHOLE OR PART OF THE SOFTWARE AND ITS DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT PRIOR, EXPRESS AND
>> WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE AUTHOR.
>>
>> The purpose of this rather restrictive license is simple: I do not want multiple
>> versions splitting off with my name in them when the program is still under
>> development. If you feel that you would like to make a serious contribution to the
>> project, please contact me.
>>
>
> Note the last sentence. It sounds like he'd be more open to community development
> than forking his code.
>
>
>
the last version of the software is from 2004, I don't know if the
situation is the same. It seems the app is not under heavy development...

And do we have examples of apps which are in development and are
splitting off rapidly, or is this an not reasonable fear?

\r

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue May 12 12:15:03 2009