Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness

From: Joe Hartley <jh@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun May 17 2009 - 18:37:59 EEST

On Sun, 17 May 2009 09:58:47 -0500 (CDT)
Brent Busby <brent@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Newbie question: Is it harmful to have QJackctl and Ardour both running
> at the same time? Do they have to potential to fight eachother, or to
> make changes to the Jack environment that will be made by one but not
> realized by the other, either in regard to jackd parameters, or in
> regard to the connection patchbays?

I always start jack with qjackctl when I'm running ardour. When ardour
sees the running instance of jack, it uses it. Perhaps that behavior
could be changed, but it's just how I want it.

-- 
======================================================================
       Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh@email-addr-hidden
 Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun May 17 20:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 17 2009 - 20:15:03 EEST