Re: [LAU] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness

Brent Busby wrote:
> On Sun, 17 May 2009, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
>
>> otoh, the only other jack application i know of that writes to
>> ~/.jackdrc is ardour; have a look at your use case when starting jackd
>> from behind ardour's open session dialog...
>
> Newbie question: Is it harmful to have QJackctl and Ardour both running
> at the same time? Do they have to potential to fight eachother, or to
> make changes to the Jack environment that will be made by one but not
> realized by the other, either in regard to jackd parameters, or in
> regard to the connection patchbays?
>

not at all. ardour and qjackctl can coexist peacefully as ever.

the original issue on debate, as brought by Fons, was due to a probable
mishap caused by the new d-bus stuff in jack2 (aka jackdmp): apparently,
jackdbus is auto-starting the jackd service without regard to what's in
~/.jackdrc. it doesn't matter whomever wrote that file in the first
place, either ardour, qjackctl or even jackd itself. jackdbus is just
making a fool out of it :)

cheers

-- 
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc@email-addr-hidden
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user