Re: [LAU] Building a DAW

I agree about the Dr_Pepper/Mr_Pibb nature of the question. But, I
was only referring to the number of times the audio crosses the A/D
then D/A boundary. In my mind, the fewer the better. All the other
issues, automation, etc., are less of a concern for me.

Cheers....

On 30 May 2009 at 16:21, Ricus Vincente <wizardofgosz@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 13:14 -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
>
> This is one of those coke/pepsi hornets-nest questions.
>
> I guess it depends upon how much I like the automation in Ardour.
>
> Plus your question has two levels. The convenience of the automation
> in the DAW, vs. the automation in the console, and the different
> question of preferring the way mixing in the box sounds over mixing
> through analog gear.
>
> There's no question in my mind that I always want my audio passing
> through analog gear on the way out (I'm taking about good analog gear
> here, not crap).
>
> Keeping the faders on my console at unity and making automation moves
> with the DAW is something that is amenable to me.
>
> Best,
> Rich...
>
>
> > > I'm mostly interested in transport controls. A control surface with
> > > faders would come in handy some times, but for mixing we have an actual
> > > analog console (a cool vintage piece at that).
> >
> > Once you're in the digital domain, are you sure you'd want to go back
> > to analog for the mixing?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-audio-user mailing list
> > Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
 

--
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user