Re: [LAU] Daemons, daemons...kill those daemons.

On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, carmen wrote:

>> Many people (including me) are using KDE4 and it's very clean and user centric
>
> i found it overtly hostile to basic tasks, like finding a web browser in an app menu
>
> plus it caused the boot-to-GUI proces to take 3 minutes
>
>> no problem. Why do some people still have problem using an app just because
>> it's a QT or KDE app? I don't get that.
>
> because, at least on Gentoo, it requires compiling all of KDE and QT, which can be a multi-day affair (compare w/ 5 seconds for dwm, 10 mins for xorg, and 15 for webkit, a 'WebOS' system in a half hour)
>
> then when you launch a KDElibs app, it launches 10 odd daemons, kdeserver, dcop, etcetc, sucking 200 MB of ram
>
>>
>> Messy? No way!
>
> the hodgepodge of panels and default icons was certainly messy

All this KDE versus non-KDE is interesting, but I already know the
downsides of KDE itself. I don't run it all the time, but like having
it on my system as an available choice.

I was just wondering though whether v4 was quite ready, or whether I
should stick to KDE 3. I suppose there are a lot of opinions on that
though, since there's a lot of discussion on that already on the
Internet right now.

For me, it comes down to:

Do you think I should allow 'qt4' in $USE at this point, or should I
stick to 'qt3' only for now? Loaded question, I know...

-- 
+ Brent A. Busby	 + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ UNIX Systems Admin	 +  banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago	 +  eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ Physical Sciences Div. +  Shakespeare.  Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ James Franck Institute +  we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user