Mark Knecht wrote:
> Is that arch, as in Arch Linux, and not arch as in ~arch on Gentoo?
That would be arch linux.
> read your web page and feel disappointed that the Gentoo install still
> either frustrates or scares off so many people
I not the more hard-core linux user around, but I would say above
average :-) And I can tell you I went after gentoo with and open mind
and time on my hands and still couldn't make that first boot. I might
have simply lost my way, and overlooked to obvious/simple/actual path,
but then that's what I did.
> but it sounds like you
> made a good decision. I hear good things about Arch.
It seems to be working out very well. A bit (or quite a bit, depending
on how you look at it) of hand-config and per-package install, but it's
a quite simple distro, very straight-ahead and seems very responsive and
up-to-date.
-- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk http://virb.com/atte _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Thu Jun 18 00:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 18 2009 - 00:15:03 EEST