Re: [LAU] Audio Distribution Proposal...

From: Atte Andre Jensen <atte.jensen@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jun 17 2009 - 22:11:14 EEST

Mark Knecht wrote:

> Is that arch, as in Arch Linux, and not arch as in ~arch on Gentoo?

That would be arch linux.

> read your web page and feel disappointed that the Gentoo install still
> either frustrates or scares off so many people

I not the more hard-core linux user around, but I would say above
average :-) And I can tell you I went after gentoo with and open mind
and time on my hands and still couldn't make that first boot. I might
have simply lost my way, and overlooked to obvious/simple/actual path,
but then that's what I did.

> but it sounds like you
> made a good decision. I hear good things about Arch.

It seems to be working out very well. A bit (or quite a bit, depending
on how you look at it) of hand-config and per-package install, but it's
a quite simple distro, very straight-ahead and seems very responsive and
up-to-date.

-- 
Atte
http://atte.dk   http://modlys.dk   http://virb.com/atte
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Jun 18 00:15:03 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 18 2009 - 00:15:03 EEST