Re: [LAU] (no subject)

On 7/12/09, drew Roberts <zotz@100jamz.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 12 July 2009 15:49:24 Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>> Dave Phillips wrote:
>> > Ken Restivo wrote:
>> >> This is awesome. Someone should start a thread of just nothing, and
>> >> .sigs.
>> >>
>> >> We could call it 4'33"
>> >
>> > Btw, I have a MIDI file of that piece, in case anyone wants it.
>> >
>> > (Totally straightfaced),
>> >
>> > dp
>>
>> cool. send it my way. i've had no soundfonts whatsoever installed on my
>> system for quite a while, and i was wondering what to do with them.
>
> I much prefer analogue silence to digital silence and midi silence comes in
> last. Well unless we get into virtual silence and imaginary silence.
>
> On a related topic, I heard that the income that can be earned from a public
> performance of this piece on a Tuesday between 9 and 11 pm is proportional
> to
> the volume at which it is performed. Can anyone on list confirm or deny this
> fict?
>
> drew

Wasn't Cages original idea that there really couldn't be a silent
piece? New sound appeared with each new audience. The audience, in a
way, become the performance. Likewise, they're the performers. So, it
seems the volume would be proportional to the amount of peeps that
paid to experience a live show. Like us, at this virtual outing on a
thread that began so softly, it's tough to remain completely silent
for too long.

-sevol
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Jul 15 16:15:03 2009