Re: [LAU] Wah update

From: Paul Coccoli <pcoccoli@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jul 22 2009 - 23:18:16 EEST

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Fons Adriaensen<fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 05:11:50PM -0700, Ken Restivo wrote:
>
>> Thanks. Alas, that seems like a very concise explanation, but I don't have the mathematical background to implement that.
>
> In the runproc() methods of classes Ladspa_Moogvcf1,2,3  you will find
> some lines like:
>
>   if (add) *p1++ += g1 * c4;
>   else     *p1++  = g1 * c4;
>
> Replace c4 by c2 and see what you get. Don't try any tricks with
> Ladspa_Moogvcf_4 - it's quite hairy.
>
> Ciao,
>

Ken - maybe you already stated this somewhere, but how close does the
CAPS AutoWah come? Maybe it's possible to swap out it's filter with
another implementation? Or raise the upper limit on the Q parameter?

Being a bass player, I've always wanted an AutoFilter plugin
(envelope-controlled LPF). If I get time, I'll start with the CAPS
AutoWah and replace the bandpass with a lowpass.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Jul 23 00:15:03 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 23 2009 - 00:15:03 EEST