Re: [LAU] Does the Edirol UA-101 work well at 192 kHz/24 bit?

Thank you so much for the info.

I'm not sure yet if, from the linux/jack/etc point of view, it would
"better" (it is relative and also depends on what you need), or more
advisable to go for a UA or FA.
I've red and searched a lot about USB and Firewire audio interfaces,
and I think I can do a short list of some of the pros and cons
(correct me if I'n wrong):

* UA/USB:
Pros:
- portable (firewire is not so common yet, I only have one in my laptop),
- there are a lot of different audio devices.
Cons:
- some UA devices aren't fully supported (maybe some more since last
time I checked Alsa matrix) yet,
- no support for USB 2.0 audio standard from the
manufacturers->special alsa drivers for every audio interface

FA/Firewire:
Pros:
-

2009/7/23, HamRadio <hamradio64@email-addr-hidden>:
> 2009/7/23 HamRadio <hamradio64@email-addr-hidden>:
>> http://freebob.sourceforge.net
>
> They have "upgraded" to:
> http://www.ffado.org
> and in fact if you see:
> http://www.ffado.org/?q=devicesupport%2Flist&filter0=edirol&filter1=&op2=OR
> the result is:
> "Full Support"!!!!
> :-))
> :-))
>

-- 
Carlos "Sanchiavedraz"
* Musix GNU+Linux
  http://www.musix.es
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user