Re: [LAU] 96kHz...because I just can't leave well enough alone...

From: Brent Busby <brent@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Aug 16 2009 - 07:26:57 EEST

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Florian Faber wrote:

> Brent Busby wrote:
>> Having obtained a solid 2ms latency at 48kHz with my Multiface II, [..]
>
> How did you measure the 2ms?

Well, that's what it says in QJackCtl. I remember some posts on here
awhile back about there being many ways of measuring it, but I don't
remember the jist of it. I do know that I've never gotten that low in
QJackCtl without xruns before though -- I used to get them just trying
to do 10ms at 44.1kHz.

I did find the problem with 96 by the way, and now I'm getting 2ms (as
shown by QJackCtl at that speed and no xruns.

-- 
+ Brent A. Busby	 + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ UNIX Systems Admin	 +  banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago	 +  eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ Physical Sciences Div. +  Shakespeare.  Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ James Franck Institute +  we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Aug 16 08:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 16 2009 - 08:15:02 EEST