[LAU] LinuxSampler higher priority than the audio card or jack?!

From: Ken Restivo <ken@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Aug 17 2009 - 11:04:50 EEST

Now, how did *that* happen?

 PID CLS RTPRIO NI PRI %CPU STAT COMMAND
    3 FF 99 - 139 0.0 S< migration/0
    4 FF 99 - 139 0.0 S< posixcputmr/0
   14 FF 99 - 139 0.0 S< watchdog/0
17559 FF 98 - 138 0.0 SLl linuxsampler
 1585 FF 85 - 125 0.0 S< IRQ-219
17562 FF 81 - 121 0.0 S midisplit
17473 FF 80 - 120 0.0 SLsl jackd
17473 FF 70 - 110 3.1 SLsl jackd
17584 FF 66 - 106 0.0 SLl jack-rack
17490 FF 65 - 105 0.9 SLl lashd
17501 FF 65 - 105 2.5 SLl fluidsynth
17502 FF 65 - 105 5.7 SLl fluidsynth
17503 FF 65 - 105 2.4 SLl fluidsynth
17559 FF 65 - 105 4.4 SLl linuxsampler
17584 FF 65 - 105 7.7 SLl jack-rack
    5 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< sirq-high/0
    6 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< sirq-timer/0
    7 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< sirq-net-tx/0
    8 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< sirq-net-rx/0
    9 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< sirq-block/0
   10 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< sirq-tasklet/0
   11 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< sirq-sched/0
   12 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< sirq-hrtimer/0
   13 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< sirq-rcu/0
   53 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< IRQ-9
  316 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< IRQ-12

 LinuxSampler grabs priority 98??!

 Most JACK apps start up at 65, as you can see, below the priority of jackd.

 IRQ-219 is my audio interface.

 How was LinuxSampler able to grab such a ridiculously high priority? Who told it to do that?

 -ken
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Aug 17 12:15:04 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 17 2009 - 12:15:04 EEST