Re: [LAU] To improve Linux audio tools: a Blender like idea

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Aug 26 2009 - 17:59:02 EEST

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Grammostola
Rosea<rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Paul Davis wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Francisco
>> López<lopezfrancisco1985@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm really no expert and never intended to make THAT kind of work, but I
>>> think we'll encounter some technical issues if we try to do that with free
>>> audio software under linux.
>>> For starters, it should require a lot of Library Stacking. Do we have a LOT
>>> of different great quality orchestral free sample libraries?
>>>
>>
>> The libraries don't have to be free. They have to be in a format
>> understood by free software. LinuxSampler understands several such
>> library formats, and is an extremely, extremely efficient sample
>> playback engine. It can do more than almost any commercial sample
>> playback software on the same hardware.
> Jan the maker of the soundtracks doesn't agree with you:

I said "they don't have to be free. they have to be in a format
understood by free software".

nothing that jan said contradicts this. what he said was, paraphrased:
more and more sample libraries are released in formats NOT understood
by free software.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Aug 26 20:15:04 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 26 2009 - 20:15:05 EEST