Re: [LAU] another csound vs supercollider question

From: cunnilinux himself <cunnilinux@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Aug 27 2009 - 15:10:04 EEST

> Like Dan said, it depends on what you're running, in hardware and software.
> I've used both systems in realtime, each performs very well in Linux with an
> rt-enabled kernel.

hardware - amd 64
software - the goal is to do the entire job with a single piece of
software. no gui for live acts, just hardware MIDI controllers.

> Which one you prefer really depends on other factors, e.g. language type,
> available opcodes, GUI, etc.

for me, those factors are (a) playing live with (b) algorythmic
compostion, and (c) synths/fx that no one else uses. and of course (d)
proper software must be GPL.
either csound and supercolider are (d) and powerful enough for (b) &
(c), but i'm interested if one of them performs better for (a).

well, i've been on csound for quite a long while, but heard about
supercollider too much, and finally i have to decide is it worth to
give it a try :)

-- 
sex, bike, open source!
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Aug 27 16:15:03 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 27 2009 - 16:15:03 EEST