> Like Dan said, it depends on what you're running, in hardware and software.
> I've used both systems in realtime, each performs very well in Linux with an
> rt-enabled kernel.
hardware - amd 64
software - the goal is to do the entire job with a single piece of
software. no gui for live acts, just hardware MIDI controllers.
> Which one you prefer really depends on other factors, e.g. language type,
> available opcodes, GUI, etc.
for me, those factors are (a) playing live with (b) algorythmic
compostion, and (c) synths/fx that no one else uses. and of course (d)
proper software must be GPL.
either csound and supercolider are (d) and powerful enough for (b) &
(c), but i'm interested if one of them performs better for (a).
well, i've been on csound for quite a long while, but heard about
supercollider too much, and finally i have to decide is it worth to
give it a try :)
-- sex, bike, open source! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Thu Aug 27 16:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 27 2009 - 16:15:03 EEST