Re: [LAU] Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:45 PM, James Cameron <quozl@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Yes, the ideal is that the tracks being played are cached in RAM so that
> no disk access is required.  The recording track would be creating a
> file that would be periodically written to disk.

this is not the ideal. its how any serious recording application has
to work. Linux filesystems can stall a thread for seconds while doing
disk i/o. you cannot do disk i/o from the thread that handles incoming
audio unless you already buffered like crazy.

ardour has a buffer of about 5 seconds, per channel, per direction
(its user configurable). both playback and recording occurs via these
buffers. ardour also tries to read/write in blocks of 256kB, since at
one point we empirically determined that this maximized disk
throughput in many cases. in an ideal world, we'd probably use O_RAW
for file i/o, and thus bypass the duplicated buffering of the kernel
FS buffer cache. but for now, that extra layer of buffering serves us
quite well (especially for read-ahead), and so we don't bother with
that.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Sep 11 20:15:04 2009