Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Thursday 24 September 2009 19:45:20 david wrote:
>> David Baron wrote:
>>> rosegarden also does scoring. I found it nearly impossible to use for
>>> this. It is one of the most complete DAW programs in linux but is now
>>> dated, stuck with KDE3, could not run on KDE4. Being converted to QT4?
>> Yes. Although some of us do not necessarily consider QT4 a good thing.
>
> Yeah, its a pity Qt isn't ported to that Emacs-OS-thing...
>
> Seriously, its just a tool-set. It doesn't matter which brand of hammer you
> use, if you get the nail to hold the picture, all is fine. Don't dismiss the
> craftsmen for using the tools he uses.
>
> Some people like the fact that Qt is usable on a lot of platforms without
> changing a single line of code. Some people like the fact that it integrates
> perfectly into the host-OS gui-wise. And some people like the fact that while
> they are free to write open-source with Qt, they can also buy professional
> support from the manufacturer.
Oh, I'm not complaining about QT in general. I'm complaining about QT4
and the "forced migration" it appears to be doing to everyone. To wit, a
lot of good enhancements and bug fixing in Rosegarden is on extended
hold until the devs finish slogging through porting it to QT4.
I guess I think there should have been much more "backwards
compatibility" in QT4 ...
Now don't get me started about the waste of time/resources known as
KDE4! ;-)
-- David gnome@email-addr-hidden authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Fri Sep 25 08:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 25 2009 - 08:15:03 EEST