Re: [LAU] jconv settings

From: Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Oct 01 2009 - 02:48:03 EEST

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 September 2009 23:51:08 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>> You are both very right about this. Gold-plating the cpu socket will
>> do wonders for the light and fast bits used to convolve the first few
>> kilosamples of a long IR - being light (and thus having little kinetic
>> energy) they really need low-resistance paths. For the later parts
>> of the IR jconv uses heavy bits, and a lot of them. Having all this
>> mass vibrate can put excessive stress on you CPU.
>
> As far as I know blind-tests show that there is no statistical prove that
> gold-plating on the cpu is any better then using a melted coat-hanger.
> It all depends on whether you talk to your cpu in a nice language and treat it
> with some goodies every now and then...

What kind of goodies do you recommend? Spilling coffee on the keyboard?

-- 
 joq
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Oct 1 04:15:04 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 01 2009 - 04:15:04 EEST