Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul Davis schrieb:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> The problem is known amongst the lmms-people yet tobydox is not that
>> eager to lay hands on it since lmms works OK with alsa and is more or
>> less designed to be a one-stop-suite.
>
> it works because it has more buffering when run like that. so, either
> run JACK with more buffering OR fix lmms. at ease ....
>
I have tested it extensively and found, that the buffers need to be
incredible high - 2048 worked for me :| the internal buffer size in lmms
needs to be set exactly the same. With that you even have a clearly
recognizable delay when doing stuff in the piano roll let alone playing
a keyboard.
And still it works not as stable as with alsa...
I met the lmms people at a fair here in Germ and I cannot remember
seeing them use jackd. They really designed lmms to be a single suite
running with alsa without a need to interact with other jack-apps.

So coming up with some good practical reasons to have lmms integrated in
jackd running with acceptable latencies and asking them for it on IRC
could be reasonable.

best regs
HZN
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrQROAACgkQ1Aecwva1SWPjBgCdGrHY2wfmAROGJWBgMlQeHS+u
yIQAn39B3/NTNvWFwwmdMAwKEVDTC1XM
=9EoB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Oct 10 12:15:01 2009