On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Jeff Sandys <sandysj@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Jonathan E. Brickman-2 wrote:
> >
> > ... The question is: Is there any reason why I
> > should not be running all audio through Jack? I heard that through
> > .asoundrc one can achieve this quite easily, and it strikes me as a way
> > to speed up the process of setup for a gig, ...
> >
> > J.E.B.
> >
> One reason not to use jack for all your sounds is you don't want mouse
> clicks, OS warnings and "you've got mail" sounds going to your audience
> or recording. Pulseaudio is intended to handle those regular user sounds
> but can have terrible latency and lack of control for the musician, even
> with the pulse-jack connection.
>
> LASH can save your jack and audio application connections and settings
> and can restore them fairly quickly, give it a try.
> -- Jeff
Hold on a minute there.
What on earth is someone doing using a machine for serious audio
work with all that crud loaded and active?
I run with all unnecessary services completely disabled (network is
only re-enabled if I want to upgrade something), the lightest and
simplest possible desktop, with zero cue sounds or special graphics
effects. Pulseaudio, if it's there, is the first thing to go straight
in the bit-bucket.
-- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sat Oct 17 00:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 17 2009 - 00:15:03 EEST