Re: [LAU] usb and jack

From: <hollunder@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Oct 25 2009 - 11:18:03 EET

On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:40:16 +0100
rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I found this info:
>
>
> "USB and jack
>
> The USB interrupt period is 1 msec. To be able to get lower latency
> with jack when using it with an USB device, you have to use a setting
> as 48kHz and 3 period. It will makes the buffer time a multiple of 1
> msec and you will get a much lower latency as with the default 2
> period. Additionaly, loading the snd-usb-audio with the parameter
> "nrpacks=1" will give you a much lower latency (for this to work take
> care that CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH is not set and
> CONFIG_USB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is not set in your running kernel)."
>
>
> http://proaudio.tuxfamily.org/wiki/index.php?title=Howto_RT_Kernel#USB_and_jack
>
>
> 1) is this info still up-to-date?
> 2) how do I exactly take care of this:
> "Additionaly, loading the snd-usb-audio with the parameter
> "nrpacks=1" will give you a much lower latency (for this to work take
> care that CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH is not set and
> CONFIG_USB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is not set in your running kernel)"
>
> (Debian (based) systems)
>
> \r

In my experience 48kHz/3 periods works a bit more stable, the possible
latency settings in jack don't really change, 64 frames is still the
lower boundary and unstable.

But I haven't heard about 2) and am very curious about this myself.

Philipp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Oct 25 12:15:05 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 25 2009 - 12:15:05 EET