Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:43 PM, <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 03:31:24PM +0000, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
>>
>>> first ask why you want more than one qjackctl instance running?
>> I'm routinely running audio systems consisting of more than
>> one machine, with usually all but one headless. And occasionally
>> I want to manually verify/modify jack connections on the remote
>> machines. So running 'ssh -X somehost qjacktl' is expected to
>> work, as it should for any X11 app, and must not depend on
>> conditions that don't matter.
>
> although in theory i agree with you fons, i note that firefox and a
> few others from the mozilla stable have realized that with
> "heavyweight" X apps, this is not *always* true.
>
> i certainly think that for an app of qjackctl's size/nature, checking
> to see if its already running *on the JACK host* can make sense, but i
> don't see how it makes sense to ask the same question about a display
> server. what is the scope of the resources that qjc has implicit
> control over? the audio interface and/or jack server on a given host.
> what is the scope of the resources that the X server has implicit
> control over? itself and the screen it controls. given that these are
> not linked, and qjc is a lightweight application, running N or more on
> the same X server seems to me to be something that should "just work".
well, i can put there an explicit command line option, say `qjackctl -X`
that will turn off the X11 display uniqueness check. additionally, i can
make it user configurable through the setup dialog, as usual
what else?
-- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rncbc@email-addr-hidden _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Fri Oct 30 00:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 30 2009 - 00:15:03 EET