Re: [LAU] LAM please!

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:53:01 +0100
Thorsten Wilms <t_w_@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 20:23 +0000, Dan S wrote:
> > 2009/11/1 Folderol <folderol@email-addr-hidden>:
> > > On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:33:46 +0100
> > > Thorsten Wilms <t_w_@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > >> Last time I tried, direct links changed from time to time, so they are
> > >> not reliable.
>
> > You just need to make sure you're using the 'main' link to an item and
> > not the uglier link which names a specific server (because the data is
> > held on server farms, similar to mirroring services).
>
> Hmm, last time I tried (long while ago), I got ugly links to specific
> servers, but if I go to one of my item pages now, I see "clean" links.
> Good :)

That clarifies things. I had a quick check on my links and they all
seemed 'clean'.

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user