On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:25:40AM -0500, Michal Seta wrote:
> Thank you all for you input. Please excuse addressing everyone in one
> email but I think this is for the sake of my sanity.
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Lorenzo <lsutton@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Although some attempts have been made (see for eg.
> > http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/MMCS.1999.778626) it
> > looks like currently network (even cabled) latency issues are still too much
> > for performing remotely.
>
> Thanks for that article. I should be able to get it through the
> university. The network latency is not THAT much of an issue to me.
> I do expect some latency and the composer who will write the music
> will take the latency into consideration. And the music will probably
> not be beat oriented in any way. That said, latencies in the range of
> tens of seconds would be a little extreme.
so what was your problem with netjack ?
did you use jack-0.118.0 ?
there have been some bad bugs in svn for some time.
but they should be fixed in the release ?
my local wireless here at home is not a problem at all,
and internet connects work fine too...
a loaded wireless pushed to the max by students wont work.
and piping uncompressed float data will also not work.
use nice 128kbit celt streams.
-- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sun Nov 22 12:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 22 2009 - 12:15:02 EET