Am 09.12.2009 um 13:13 schrieb Atte André Jensen
<atte.jensen@gmail.com>:
> Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>
>>> That, to me, it the only sensible way to think about it. The fact
>>> that
>>> we're linux based, might mean something to *us*, but the listener
>>> doesn't care. To me it's just about as arbitrary reason as
>>> starting a
>>> label based on which brand of shoes we wear.
>> Never forget that millions of albums have been sold based on that
>> concept so you might be onto something there :-)
>
> :-)
>
> I hope you realize that I absolutely love both my linux box and you
> guys! It's nothing to do with that.
>
> I'm just thinking what profile should such a label have? If it's
> "only"
> the fact that the music is produced with linux, it's main goal I guess
> would be to promote linux as a pro-audio platform. But that's just
> fine.
>
> I imagine most netlabels (besides from the "we, a group of friends,
> start this label to promote our own music") are started with
> motivations, more like "this undergroundish genre needs a platform" or
> something that rhymes with that.
>
If there was a revision control system that could handle binary files
well, and if there was decent linux audio session managment, now that
would be something to build a linux netlabel on...
- Burkhard
> --
> Atte
>
> http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Dec 11 04:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 11 2009 - 04:15:02 EET