Re: [LAU] Value of low-latency in audio?

From: <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Dec 12 2009 - 22:59:10 EET

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:11:37PM -0600, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:

> It is rather rare now in the USA to find a real
> pipe-organ accompanying a real choir.

So what *is* being used ? Electronic organ + electronic choir ?
:-)

Ciao,

-- 
FA
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Received on Sun Dec 13 00:15:05 2009

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Folderol: "Re: [LAU] Composing fast[was] LAM annual Best of mix 2009"
Previous message: Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas: "[LAU] KMetronome 0.9.1 released"
In reply to: Jonathan E. Brickman: "Re: [LAU] Value of low-latency in audio?"
Next in thread: Tracey Hytry: "Re: [LAU] Value of low-latency in audio?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 13 2009 - 00:15:05 EET